{"record":{"author":{"account_ref":null,"orcid":null},"builds_on":[],"content_schema":"pubphys.content.revision/1","content_sha256":"47de416a3b0c69181b2e8755c634fe3fd5e3e2c83a40e9551101ffc00655f78d","created":"2026-10-03T07:17:53Z","files":[],"origin":{"assisted_by":[],"kind":"seed"},"parents":["5475cf5dc5b1a72283d26dc95dc6e00d7ea4e00096a7c6492e409a1816eeb011"],"salt":"fb35e9fdad26b2cd1a53e9d91b64e3efbd2a999fa73c02c69490c12afb1cfd95","schema":"pubphys.record/2","site":"pubphys.com","target":null,"type":"revision"},"content":{"answer_type":"value","assisted_by":[],"external_id":"amo.fine-structure-constant.electron-g2-sm-test","kind":"well-posed","literature_status":"open","n":"1","parents":[],"plain":"The electron behaves like a tiny magnet whose strength has been measured to about one part in ten trillion. Using $\\alpha$ from atom experiments, theory predicts the same number, and any mismatch would point to new particles or forces.","posed_since":"","precise":"With $g/2 = -\\mu_e/\\mu_B$ measured to 0.13 ppt ($a_e = (g-2)/2$ to 0.11 ppb, absolute uncertainty 1.3e-13; Fan et al 2023) and $a_e(\\mathrm{SM})$ computed from $\\alpha(\\mathrm{recoil})$ plus QED (five-loop coefficient now agreed between two groups), hadronic and electroweak terms, determine whether $\\delta a_e = a_e(\\mathrm{exp}) - a_e(\\mathrm{SM})$ differs from zero; at present $\\delta a_e$ has opposite signs for $\\alpha(\\mathrm{Cs})$ and $\\alpha(\\mathrm{Rb})$, at roughly $-2.2\\ \\sigma$ and $+2\\ \\sigma$. The answer is $\\delta a_e$ with total uncertainty below 1e-13 and its significance.","problem_ref":null,"references":"","settled_by":"Resolution of the Cs-Rb $\\alpha$ discrepancy combined with an improved $a_{e}$ measurement, yielding a single $\\delta a_{e}$ with uncertainty below 1e-13.","status_note":"The $5\\sigma$ disagreement between the two five-loop QED evaluations was removed in December 2024 (arXiv 2412.06473), so the remaining obstacle is the Cs-Rb $\\alpha$ discrepancy.","title":"Is the electron magnetic moment anomaly consistent with the Standard Model?","topic_ref":"4128c66497f0d271de4f884d65d6c0eabac35c2b12d26184409fe9547beca009"},"attested":{"attestation":{"batch":null,"client_id":null,"id_token_sha256":null,"kind":"platform"},"record_hash":"2525faffc272c86574c0ba515e8b1046c8750641804f8e7550dbf929c9641853","schema":"pubphys.attested/1"},"envelope":{"attested_hash":"779e79594e31cfd40b17854ddf01aee3f01bc3129a5057e2a60486de49f1a087","platform_signature":{"key_id":"c6afc19b31429869751f06879c75cd64ea92654423d15b44be775bf1310a60da","sig":"x12oq42ck9stpSanCEZ9rLhlPuJcqemxIdnOK3JiPtO--tK-rEt7DpPcEq-O7Nle2hBzQG8ZBLbesdJ2TV4NAQ"},"schema":"pubphys.envelope/1"},"record_hash":"2525faffc272c86574c0ba515e8b1046c8750641804f8e7550dbf929c9641853","leaf_index":411}