{"record":{"author":{"account_ref":null,"orcid":null},"builds_on":[],"content_schema":"pubphys.content.topic/1","content_sha256":"7bc9ffb55baf22c84d4d02fc3b30c6b43cee290edf8010ef336ad12a7c105eb9","created":"2026-10-03T07:17:52Z","files":[],"origin":{"assisted_by":[],"kind":"seed"},"parents":[],"salt":"b1c8b0a0438a4bd5947ec7d676dac22a3453d4e607b0434fe98b4d5fc7f57630","schema":"pubphys.record/2","site":"pubphys.com","target":null,"type":"topic"},"content":{"external_id":"qi.fault-tolerance-noise","field":"qi","n":"1","review_cite":"B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Reviews of Modern Physics, 2015","review_link":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.3428","review_verified":"true","summary":"Quantum computers make errors, and error-correcting codes can fix them only if errors are rare enough and not too strongly linked across qubits. How much noise, and of what kind, error correction can tolerate, and whether logical errors keep falling as codes grow, are open.","title":"Fault-tolerance thresholds and logical error scaling","topic_ref":null,"why":"Whether error correction keeps working as real devices grow decides whether large quantum computations are possible at all."},"attested":{"attestation":{"batch":null,"client_id":null,"id_token_sha256":null,"kind":"platform"},"record_hash":"80758bd22592650de3fabeac0b32e47b1837a24802ff82348134607b99eeaa5a","schema":"pubphys.attested/1"},"envelope":{"attested_hash":"2405c9796f3e8da078c5c676b0eecd27da477edfb5330d8630b3ed09ce768eeb","platform_signature":{"key_id":"c6afc19b31429869751f06879c75cd64ea92654423d15b44be775bf1310a60da","sig":"xsUy0VBLeKd6aKzAWiPHSB0w8KUYC0Fv6hDmIUHowxvIWYQLPl-HC-DOs1wsM_EMyNKRCXKVjKkq4xnhzx3NCQ"},"schema":"pubphys.envelope/1"},"record_hash":"80758bd22592650de3fabeac0b32e47b1837a24802ff82348134607b99eeaa5a","leaf_index":333}