{"record":{"author":{"account_ref":null,"orcid":null},"builds_on":[],"content_schema":"pubphys.content.revision/1","content_sha256":"4756c13c0f410294c0024ce21444695a1e9de396fb5b693b2e8f353548201662","created":"2026-10-15T23:43:22Z","files":[],"origin":{"assisted_by":["ai:gpt-5.5"],"kind":"seed"},"parents":["bb9ca2e2ee12d930d868121bebc8940dd59ec3d6c3bc44b9dfa4364bbd9a7a7b","ce59fb6cd812fc05906d0c60a71c75ea22bc686bcf38e7c3ef7010834d98ee7b"],"salt":"2a6c36a725db25c842eade0713fc72135df7936bd34fc48deab30a847c5d22c6","schema":"pubphys.record/2","site":"pubphys.com","target":null,"type":"revision"},"content":{"answer_type":"mechanism","assisted_by":["ai:gpt-5.5"],"external_id":"hep.hierarchy-problem.origin-weak-scale","kind":"phenomenon","literature_status":"open","n":"2","parents":[],"plain":"The Higgs field sets the masses of most particles at about $246\\,\\mathrm{GeV}$, roughly $10^{17}$ times below the scale where gravity becomes strong. No known principle explains this huge gap without extreme fine cancellations.","posed_since":"1979","precise":"In the SM with a cutoff $\\Lambda$, the top loop gives $\\delta m_h^{2} \\sim -(3 y_t^{2}/(8 \\pi^{2})) \\Lambda^{2}$, so $m_h = 125\\,\\mathrm{GeV}$ with $\\Lambda \\sim M_{\\mathrm{Pl}} \\sim 1.2 \\times 10^{19}\\,\\mathrm{GeV}$ requires cancellation to about 1 part in $10^{33}$. An answer is a mechanism (symmetry, compositeness, dynamics or selection) that yields $v = 246\\,\\mathrm{GeV}$ with at most mild tuning and is consistent with all LHC data.","problem_ref":"bb9ca2e2ee12d930d868121bebc8940dd59ec3d6c3bc44b9dfa4364bbd9a7a7b","references":"","settled_by":"Discovery at a collider of the particles or form factors predicted by a specific mechanism, or a calculable non-collider mechanism confirmed by its own distinct predictions.","status_note":"LHC Run 2 and early Run 3 data (to 2025) show no top partners, superpartners or composite resonances near 1 TeV, pushing simple natural models to percent-level tuning or worse.","title":"Why is the electroweak scale so far below the Planck scale?","topic_ref":null},"attested":{"attestation":{"batch":null,"client_id":null,"id_token_sha256":null,"kind":"platform"},"record_hash":"f3092e243d427724270dc30011b9f11a447a4efd01613c2fb2291c02391d1aa5","schema":"pubphys.attested/1"},"envelope":{"attested_hash":"ea63e3d7be09d6971e30f2f85cb3cc72130bd99213c286e12cebd7812aeb6d55","platform_signature":{"key_id":"c6afc19b31429869751f06879c75cd64ea92654423d15b44be775bf1310a60da","sig":"C_FFOSSrpUixVT24Cx_qBpWPq34Z25ASBRlkloj88qFvvqi_2V0HOlwLsk-zxzVH28vbeIkLaJYOf3LW8lxzAQ"},"schema":"pubphys.envelope/1"},"record_hash":"f3092e243d427724270dc30011b9f11a447a4efd01613c2fb2291c02391d1aa5","leaf_index":3354}