Does the gap change sign between hole and electron pockets? · revision history
Revision 1
Superseded · first revision · record
- Title
- Does the gap change sign between hole and electron pockets
- Plain
- The leading theory says the pairing amplitude has opposite sign on different pockets of the Fermi surface ($s\pm$ pairing); several experiments support it but a direct sign measurement is lacking.
- Precise
- In bulk iron pnictides with both hole pockets at $\Gamma$ and electron pockets at $M$ (for example Ba1-xKxFe2As2, LiFeAs), establish by a phase-sensitive probe whether the gap changes sign between them ($s\pm$) or not ($s++$). An answer is a measurement in which the sign enters directly, such as a Josephson interferometer or phase-referenced quasiparticle interference with known impurity potentials.
- Settled by
- A phase-sensitive interference or Josephson experiment with an unambiguous sign signature reproduced in two materials.
- Kind
- well-posed
- Answer type
- yes-no
- References
- (empty)
- Literature status
- partially-resolved
- Status note
- Neutron spin resonance and phase-referenced quasiparticle interference support $s\pm$; some impurity-scattering results were argued to favor $s++$.
- Posed since
- 2008