CM
In the literature: contested
Is time-reversal breaking in Sr2RuO4 an intrinsic bulk property
In plain words
Muon and optical experiments see signs that the superconducting state of Sr2RuO4 picks a sense of rotation, breaking time-reversal symmetry, but the signal may come from defects.
Precise statement
Determine whether the time-reversal symmetry breaking seen by zero-field muSR and polar Kerr rotation below $T_c$ in Sr2RuO4 is a bulk property of the superconducting order parameter or is tied to dislocations and local strain. An answer compares muSR and Kerr signal size across samples with measured defect density, and tests whether the signal onset follows $T_c$ under stress and disorder.
What would settle it
Systematic muSR and Kerr studies on samples with controlled dislocation density showing whether the signal scales with volume or with defects.
Related problems
- Special case of What is the superconducting order parameter of Sr2RuO4