Is primordial local non-Gaussianity of order one? · revision history

Revision 2

Accepted · core change · record

Changes against revision 1:

Title
Is primordial local non-Gaussianity of order one?
Plain
If only one field drove inflation, the primordial ripples should be almost perfectly bell-curve distributed. Several fields would leave a measurable correlation between large and small ripples.
Precise · changed · core
Revision 1: Measure the local bispectrum amplitude $f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}}$; Planck 2018 gives $f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}} = -0.9 \pm 5.1$. Single-field inflation predicts $\left|f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}}\right| \ll 1$ in the squeezed limit; many multi-field models give $\left|f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}}\right| \ge 1$. An answer is $f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}}$ with sigma below 0.5 from scale-dependent galaxy bias and CMB.
Revision 2: Measure the local bispectrum amplitude $f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}}$; Planck 2018 gives $f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}} = -0.9 \pm 5.1$. Single-field inflation predicts $\left|f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}}\right| \ll 1$ in the squeezed limit; many multi-field models give $\left|f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}}\right| \ge 1$. An answer is $f_{\mathrm{NL}}^{\mathrm{local}}$ with $\sigma$ below 0.5 from scale-dependent galaxy bias and CMB.
Settled by
SPHEREx and Rubin scale-dependent bias measurements combined with CMB bispectra.
Kind
well-posed
Answer type
value
References
(empty)
Literature status
open
Status note
(empty)
Posed since
(empty)

Decisions