Decay exponent of freely decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence · revision history

Revision 1

Accepted · first revision · record

Title
Decay exponent of freely decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence
Plain
When stirring stops, turbulence in a box dies away with its energy falling as a power of time. Measured powers differ by up to a factor of two between experiments, and theory gives competing values that depend on how the largest swirls were set up.
Precise
Freely decaying homogeneous isotropic Navier-Stokes turbulence at high Re has kinetic energy $K(t) \sim t^{-n}$. Kolmogorov's argument with a conserved Loitsyansky integral gives $n = 10/7$ for an initial spectrum $E(k) \sim k^4$ at small $k$; Saffman's conserved integral gives $n = 6/5$ for $E(k) \sim k^2$. Determine whether n is fixed by the low-wavenumber exponent of the initial spectrum alone as $\mathrm{Re} \to \infty \text{ and } t \to \infty$ in a domain much larger than the integral scale, whether the Loitsyansky integral is conserved, and the value of n for each class.
Settled by
DNS in domains much larger than the integral scale over long decay times at high Re, measuring n and the time dependence of the Loitsyansky and Saffman integrals for controlled initial spectra.
Kind
well-posed
Answer type
value
References
(empty)
Literature status
contested
Status note
2022 DNS observe both exponents approximately and over limited times for suitably arranged initial conditions, but the low-wavenumber spectrum drifts, so the invariants are not strictly conserved (Panickacheril John, Donzis, Sreenivasan, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2022).
Posed since
(empty)