Does the Larmor tunneling time saturate for thick barriers? · revision history

Revision 1

Accepted · first revision · record

Title
Does the Larmor tunneling time saturate for thick barriers?
Plain
The Hartman effect predicts that the tunneling delay stops growing as the barrier gets thicker, which would imply speeds above that of light. Cold-atom experiments that use an atom's spin as a built-in clock can now test this.
Precise
For cold atoms (e.g. 87Rb) tunneling through an optical barrier with an internal-state Larmor clock, measure the transmitted-atom Larmor times $\tau_y$ and $\tau_z$ versus barrier width $L$ in the opaque regime $\kappa L >> 1$, $\kappa = \sqrt{2 m (V_0 - E)} / \hbar$, and determine whether they saturate with $L$ as the Hartman effect predicts for the phase delay.
Settled by
A Larmor-clock measurement over a range of $L$ reaching $\kappa L$ of several, with transmission high enough to resolve the precession.
Kind
well-posed
Answer type
yes-no
References
(empty)
Literature status
open
Status note
Larmor times of about 0.6 ms were measured for rubidium atoms in 2020, and their decrease at lower incident energy was reported in 2021 (arXiv:2101.12309).
Posed since
1962